Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Central Asian Survey, 2026 (SSCI, Scopus)
This article examines the extent of divergence between a binary opposition of Central Asian local versus Western outlets by expanding the focus and incorporating four categories of media, such as local state-controlled, local independent, Western critical and Western liberal-pragmatic. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative content analysis of news coverage from 2018 to 2023, the study identifies both convergences and discrepancies across these groups. The study argues that media outlets emphasize certain issue areas while marginalizing others, thereby exposing structural biases in how regional relations are represented. The results show that while state-controlled media dominate visibility by promoting selectively positive narratives of cooperation, independent outlets introduce limited but crucial pluralism, and Western media, both critical and liberal-pragmatic, amplify risk-oriented framings, together producing a structurally biased and fragmented representation of Central Asian regional relations. Such divergences not only shape local and Western perceptions of Central Asia but also contribute to the construction of competing narratives about the region’s political trajectory, economic development, and cultural identity and highlights the need for media plurality in Central Asia.