Automated identification of copy-move forgery using Hessian and patch feature extraction techniques


AYDIN Y.

Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol.69, no.1, pp.131-138, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 69 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.1111/1556-4029.15415
  • Journal Name: Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Periodicals Index Online, Aerospace Database, Analytical Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Communication Abstracts, Criminal Justice Abstracts, EBSCO Legal Source, Metadex, Veterinary Science Database, DIALNET, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.131-138
  • Keywords: copy-move forgery, forgery detection, Hessian, image authentication, image forensics, keypoint, patch
  • Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Copy-move forgeries are a conceptual sort of image retouching that involves duplicating a portion of an image and moving it to a different position within the original image, whether by modifying the duplicated part or just moving it altogether. To identify cloned portions that have been reproduced into the same digitized image, the suggested hybrid features in this article combine using the Hessian and Raw patch features on gray-level images. Using a suggested model that combines patch features built on key points detected by the Hessian detector on gray-level image, localization of duplicated and pasted portions of the manipulated image were found. After using the combined features in the matching step, the parallelism condition was applied together with the random sample consensus method to eliminate mismatches. Two databases, GRIP and the image manipulation dataset (IMD), were used for the detection and characterization, and the empirical findings show that the approach was successful in achieving an F1 score 100% for the GRIP database. Additionally, with the IMD database, it produced a 92.13% F1 score. The proposed method was also shown to be effective by obtaining high F1 scores in images where noise, JPEG compression, and scaling attacks were applied to make forgery detection difficult.