Benchmark tests for strong ground motion prediction methods: Case for numerical methods (part 2)

Creative Commons License

Yoshimura C., Nagano M., Hisada Y., Aoi S., Hayakawa T., ÇİTAK S. Ö., ...Daha Fazla

AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, cilt.18, sa.38, ss.95-100, 2012 (Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 18 Sayı: 38
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3130/aijt.18.95
  • Dergi Adı: AIJ Journal of Technology and Design
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.95-100
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Benchmark test, Fault model, Finite difference method, Finite element method, Numerical simulation, Seismic ground motion
  • Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

We performed a benchmark test for strong motion simulation methods using numerical methods (finite difference method and finite element method). We considered a four-layered model, a symmetric basin model and a slant basement basin model. All the results calculated by six teams from different institutions generally show good agreement to each other. We found minor differences of phase arrival time between institutions and minute differences between FDM and FEM for some models.