Perceptions, challenges, and opportunities of qualitative research among inexperienced medical academics


Creative Commons License

Gürsoy E., Vatansever M.

BMC Medical Education, cilt.25, sa.1, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 25 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1186/s12909-025-07824-1
  • Dergi Adı: BMC Medical Education
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Academic research barriers, Perception, Primary care, Qualitative research, Research design
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Although qualitative research is vital to healthcare, it remains underused in medical academia.This study therefore aims to examine in depth the perceptions of medical faculty academics without prior experience in conducting qualitative research, the challenges they face, and the potential contributions of these methods to health research. Methods: The research is based on a descriptive qualitative study conducted with twelve faculty members specialising in various medical disciplines in three different provinces in Türkiye. Participants were selected using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling methods to ensure a diverse and relevant sample. Face-to-face and Zoom interviews were carried out using structured interview techniques, and data collection continued until data saturation was achieved. The interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the thematic analysis method. The study followed the “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research” (COREQ) checklist to ensure comprehensive reporting of the qualitative research process. Results: Academics acknowledge the significant value of qualitative research in the field of health; however, they are unable to use these methods effectively due to problems such as a lack of practical experience, limited institutional support, and inadequate training programs.Participants also pointed out that they required targeted mentoring and hands-on training to address these issues. Some participants expressed concerns about the time-intensive nature of qualitative studies, which often conflicts with their existing professional responsibilities. Others emphasised the lack of recognition and incentives for qualitative research within institutional policies, further discouraging engagement. Despite these barriers, several participants also highlighted the complementary nature of qualitative and quantitative methods, particularly in addressing complex health problems. Conclusions: Integrating qualitative methodologies into medical faculties can support a deeper understanding of complex health problems. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced hands-on training and stronger institutional support to enable inexperienced academics to engage more effectively with qualitative research.