Significance of Preoperative Multidisciplinary Assessment with 30-Second Sit-to-Stand and Timed Up-and-Go Tests in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes


Yücel M. O., Sağlam S., Dalaslan R. E., Arıcan M., Karaduman Z. O., Akar B., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Clinical Medicine, cilt.14, sa.4, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/jcm14041085
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: ASA physical status classification, functional recovery, knee prosthetic arthroplasty, postoperative period
  • Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background/Objectives: Evaluating basic daily activities like sitting, standing, and walking is crucial for predicting preoperative risks and postoperative recovery. These functional abilities can be assessed through patient history or measured using objective tests. For this purpose, the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand (30STS) Test and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test are frequently used in clinical settings. However, few studies have evaluated their effectiveness in anesthesia and orthopedics. In this study, we aimed to assess the applicability of these tests across clinical disciplines. Methods: A total of 43 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery between January and December 2023 with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of 2–3 were retrospectively evaluated. The 30STS, TUG, and VAS scores were recorded preoperatively and on postoperative days 90–180. Results: The preoperative 30STS and TUG scores showed no statistically significant difference between the ASA 2–3 groups, but the ASA 2 group demonstrated a more pronounced performance improvement in both tests during the first 90 days postoperatively. The correlation tests revealed a strong positive relationship with the TUG Test and a moderate positive relationship with the 30STS and VAS scores. Conclusions: The correlation between the preoperative and postoperative results of the 30STS and TUG Tests suggests that preoperative tests can predict post-operative functional performance. However, the lack of a significant statistical relationship between the preoperative tests and ASA scores indicates that these tests may not be sufficiently useful for assessing the functional capacity. The better test outcomes in the ASA 2 patients indicate that combining these assessments with anesthetic evaluations may improve postoperative functional predictions, thereby promoting a multidisciplinary approach.