Maresin-1 and maresin-2 as synovial fluid biomarkers in psoriatic, rheumatoid, and osteoarthritis


Creative Commons License

Demir S., Can B., Esmez O., AYDIN A., Gencer S. Y., Bildirici F., ...More

Frontiers in Medicine, vol.13, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 13
  • Publication Date: 2026
  • Doi Number: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1856412
  • Journal Name: Frontiers in Medicine
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Keywords: arthritis, biomarker, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, synovial fluid
  • Open Archive Collection: AVESIS Open Access Collection
  • Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Objective – To investigate synovial fluid levels of maresin-1 (MaR-1) and maresin-2 (MaR-2) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), and controls, and to assess their ability to differentiate PsA from RA. Methods – This prospective cross-sectional study included 88 patients undergoing knee arthrocentesis for joint effusion between September 2025 and February 2026. RA was classified according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria, PsA using CASPAR criteria, and OA based on clinical and radiographic assessment. Synovial fluid MaR-1 and MaR-2 concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and expressed as ng/mL. Group comparisons were performed using parametric or non-parametric statistical tests as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of MaR-1 and MaR-2 for distinguishing PsA from RA, including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cut-off values. Logistic regression analysis assessed the association between MaR-1 levels and PsA. Results – Significant intergroup differences were observed for age, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and synovial MaR-1 concentrations (all p < 0.01). MaR-1 levels were significantly higher in PsA than RA (p < 0.01), whereas MaR-2 showed more modest differences among groups (p < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated good discriminatory performance of MaR-1 for differentiating PsA from RA, with an AUC of 0.815 (95% CI, 0.675–0.933). A cut-off value of 3.252 ng/mL provided 68.2% sensitivity and 86.4% specificity. Higher MaR-1 levels were significantly associated with PsA in unadjusted logistic regression analysis (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.18–2.22; p = 0.003). MaR-1 and MaR-2 levels were moderately positively correlated (Spearman’s r = 0.620, p < 0.001). Conclusion – Synovial MaR-1 concentrations were markedly elevated in PsA compared with RA and demonstrated good diagnostic discrimination, supporting the potential role of pro-resolving mediators as biomarkers in inflammatory arthropathies. The clinical significance of MaR-2 appears more limited and requires validation in larger studies.