PINAR, S. Et Al. 2012. DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE. BIOLOGY OF SPORT , vol.29, no.4 , 269-275.

PINAR, S., Kaya, F., Bicer, B., Erzeybek, M. S., & ÇOTUK, H. B., (2012). DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE. BIOLOGY OF SPORT , vol.29, no.4, 269-275.

PINAR, SALİH Et Al. "DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE," BIOLOGY OF SPORT , vol.29, no.4, 269-275, 2012

PINAR, SALİH Et Al. "DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE." BIOLOGY OF SPORT , vol.29, no.4, pp.269-275, 2012

PINAR, S. Et Al. (2012) . "DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE." BIOLOGY OF SPORT , vol.29, no.4, pp.269-275.

@article{article, author={SALİH PINAR Et Al. }, title={DIFFERENT RECOVERY METHODS AND MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER EXHAUSTING EXERCISE: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION AND MASSAGE}, journal={BIOLOGY OF SPORT}, year=2012, pages={269-275} }